Re: [PATCH -V1 05/22] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Date: Thu May 01 2014 - 11:17:09 EST
Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:23:01AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:44:36 +0530
>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Some permission models distinguish between the permission to create a
>> > non-directory and a directory. Pass this information down to
>> > inode_permission() as mask flags
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > fs/namei.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
>> > include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
>> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
>> > index 7d93d195f0e5..028bc8bcf77c 100644
>> > --- a/fs/namei.c
>> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
>> > @@ -445,7 +445,8 @@ static int sb_permission(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode, int mask)
>> > * this, letting us set arbitrary permissions for filesystem access without
>> > * changing the "normal" UIDs which are used for other things.
>> > *
>> > - * When checking for MAY_APPEND, MAY_WRITE must also be set in @mask.
>> > + * When checking for MAY_APPEND, MAY_CREATE_FILE, MAY_CREATE_DIR,
>> > + * MAY_WRITE must also be set in @mask.
>> > */
>> > int inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
>> > {
>> > @@ -2444,14 +2445,16 @@ static int may_delete(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *victim, bool isdir)
>> > * 3. We should have write and exec permissions on dir
>> > * 4. We can't do it if dir is immutable (done in permission())
>> > */
>> > -static inline int may_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *child)
>> > +static inline int may_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *child, bool isdir)
>> > {
>> > + int mask = isdir ? MAY_CREATE_DIR : MAY_CREATE_FILE;
>> > +
>> > audit_inode_child(dir, child, AUDIT_TYPE_CHILD_CREATE);
>> > if (child->d_inode)
>> > return -EEXIST;
>> > if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
>> > return -ENOENT;
>> > - return inode_permission(dir, MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC);
>> > + return inode_permission(dir, MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | mask);
>> > }
>> >
>> > /*
>> > @@ -2501,7 +2504,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_rename);
>> > int vfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
>> > bool want_excl)
>> > {
>> > - int error = may_create(dir, dentry);
>> > + int error = may_create(dir, dentry, 0);
>>
>> nit: since the third argument here is a bool, this should be "false"
>> and not "0". Ditto for all of the other calls of may_create.
>
> IMO, the third argument should be MAY_CREATE_FILE or MAY_CREATE_DIR,
> which is what the boolean evaluates to in may_create()....
Will do that.
Thanks
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/