Re: random: Providing a seed value to VM guests

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Thu May 01 2014 - 16:33:22 EST


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> RDSEED is not synchronous. It is, however, nonblocking.

What I mean is: IIUC it's reasonable to call RDSEED a few times in a
loop and hope it works. It makes no sense to do that with
/dev/random.

>
> On May 1, 2014 1:16:40 PM PDT, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On May 1, 2014 12:26 PM, <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Is RDSEED really reasonable here? Won't it slow down by several
>>> > orders of magnitude?
>>>
>>> That is I think the biggest problem; RDRAND and RDSEED are fast if
>>> they are native, but they will involve a VM exit if they need to be
>>> emulated. So when an OS might want to use RDRAND and RDSEED might be
>>> quite different if we know they are being emulated.
>>>
>>> Using the RDRAND and RDSEED "api" certainly makes sense, at least for
>>> x86, but I suspect we might want to use a different way of signalling
>>> that a VM guest can use RDRAND and RDSEED if they are running on a
>>CPU
>>> which doesn't provide that kind of access. Maybe a CPUID extended
>>> function parameter, if one could be allocated for use by a Linux
>>> hypervisor?
>>>
>>
>>I'm still not convinced. This will affect userspace as well as the
>>guest kernel, and I don't see why guest user code should be able to
>>access this API. RDRAND for CPL0 only would work, but that seems odd.
>>
>>And I think that RDSEED emulation is asking for trouble. RDSEED is
>>synchronous, but /dev/random is asynchronous. And making bootup wait
>>for even a single byte from /dev/random seems bad. In any event,
>>virtio-rng should be a better interface for this.
>>
>>> - Ted
>>>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.



--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/