Re: [3.15-rc3] rtmutex-debug assertion.

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:13:57AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
 > On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > This is trickier to reproduce than it first seemed, as logging slows
 > > things down so much.  But after a few hours, it logged that the
 > > call that triggered this was..
 > > 
 > > futex(uaddr=0x7f55ff8c4000, op=0x6, val=0x200000006223800b, utime=0x7f55ff8c4000, uaddr2=0x7f55ff8c4000, val3=-123)
 > > 
 > > Those addresses come from an mmap we made on startup..
 > > 
 > > [init] mapping[3]: (zeropage PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE) 0x7f55ff8c4000 (1MB)
 > > 
 > > op = FUTEX_LOCK_PI
 > > 
 > > val seems to be garbage.
 > > 
 > > I'll do another run, just to see if it's always the same set of values,
 > > but it's going to probably take an overnight run.
 > 
 > Do you have the full fuzzing log, so I can see what happened
 > before/around that?

This is tough, because it takes a long time to reproduce when the
logging is enabled, and that ends up generating a lot of output.
I've tried to cut it down some using just 4 threads, but that's
still over 30M of logs.
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/futex.tar.xz

In this run, child0 was the pid that faulted.
You can see the last line in trinity-child0.log has a similar
fingerprint to the trace above.

One thing that does look suspicious, is that all 4 threads were doing
op=0x6 right before the kernel went south.

Hope this helps.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/