Re: [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work

[Rik van Riel]

On 05/02/2014 02:13 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 00:42 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
>> Whether or not this is the right thing to do remains to be seen,
>> but it does allow us to verify whether or not the wake_affine
>> strategy of always doing affine wakeups and only disabling them
>> in a specific circumstance is sound, or needs rethinking...
> 
> Yes, it needs rethinking.
> 
> I know why you want to try this, yes, select_idle_sibling() is very much
> a two faced little bitch.

My biggest problem with select_idle_sibling and wake_affine in
general is that it will override NUMA placement, even when
processes only wake each other up infrequently...

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/