Re: [PATCH 3/4] memcg, doc: clarify global vs. limit reclaims

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Fri May 02 2014 - 05:43:58 EST


On Wed 30-04-14 19:03:50, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:26:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Be explicit about global and hard limit reclaims in our documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > index 4937e6fff9b4..add1be001416 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > @@ -236,23 +236,26 @@ it by cgroup.
> > 2.5 Reclaim
> >
> > Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU which has the same structure as
> > -global VM. When a cgroup goes over its limit, we first try
> > -to reclaim memory from the cgroup so as to make space for the new
> > -pages that the cgroup has touched. If the reclaim is unsuccessful,
> > -an OOM routine is invoked to select and kill the bulkiest task in the
> > -cgroup. (See 10. OOM Control below.)
> > -
> > -The reclaim algorithm has not been modified for cgroups, except that
> > -pages that are selected for reclaiming come from the per-cgroup LRU
> > -list.
> > -
> > -NOTE: Reclaim does not work for the root cgroup, since we cannot set any
> > -limits on the root cgroup.
> > +global VM. Cgroups can get reclaimed basically under two conditions
> > + - under global memory pressure when all cgroups are reclaimed
> > + proportionally wrt. their LRU size in a round robin fashion
> > + - when a cgroup or its hierarchical parent (see 6. Hierarchical support)
> > + hits hard limit. If the reclaim is unsuccessful, an OOM routine is invoked
> > + to select and kill the bulkiest task in the cgroup. (See 10. OOM Control
> > + below.)
>
> In the whole hierarchy, not just that cgroup.

Right. Fixed

> > +Global and hard-limit reclaims share the same code the only difference
> > +is the objective of the reclaim. The global reclaim aims at balancing
> > +zones' watermarks while the limit reclaim frees some memory to allow new
> > +charges.
>
> This is a kswapd vs. direct reclaim issue, not global vs. memcg.
> Memcg reclaim just happens to be direct reclaim. Either way, I'd
> rather not have such implementation details in the user documentation.

OK, removed

> > +NOTE: Hard limit reclaim does not work for the root cgroup, since we cannot set
> > +any limits on the root cgroup.
>
> Not sure it's necessary to include this...

removed as well.

Incremental patch on top:
---