Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] sched: idle: Encapsulate the code to compile it out

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 05/02/2014 02:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 02, 2014 10:59:11 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 05/01/2014 12:56 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:47:25 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 02:01:02 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > > > Encapsulate the large portion of cpuidle_idle_call inside another
> > > > > function so when CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=n, the code will be compiled out.
> > > > > Also that is benefitial for the clarity of the code as it removes
> > > > > a nested indentation level.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Well, this conflicts with
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4071541/
> > > >
> > > > which you haven't commented on and I still want cpuidle_select() to be able to
> > > > return negative values because of
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4089631/
> > > >
> > > > (and I have one more patch on top of these two that requires this).
> > >
> > > Moreover (along the lines of Nico said) after https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4071541/
> > > we actually don't need the #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE in your patch, because cpuidle_select()
> > > for CONFIG_CPU_IDLE unset is a static inline returning a negative number and the compiler
> > > should optimize out the blocks that depend on it being non-negative.
> >
> > Thanks for the head up.
> >
> > Actually that was to solve a compilation issue with the next patch when
> > adding the cpuidle state in the struct rq.
> >
> > When the option CPU_IDLE is not set, the code assinging the cpu idle
> > state in the rq is still there while in the struct rq the field is
> > compiled out with the ifdef macro. If I rely on the compiler
> > optimization, the compilation error will happen.
>
> I see.
>
> If you don't put the new idle_state field in struct_rq under the #ifdef,
> you won't need to worry about the build problem.
>
> Alternatively, you can define
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> static inline void rq_set_idle_state(struct rq *rq, struct cpuidle_state *state)
> {
> 	rq->idle_state = state;
> }
> #else
> static inline void rq_set_idle_state(struct rq *rq, struct cpuidle_state *state) {}
> #endif
>
> and use rq_set_idle_state() to set that field.

Thanks, I will look at one or another solution.




--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/