Re: [RFC/HACK] x86: Fast return to kernel

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 2 May 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Also, are you *really* sure that "popf" has the same one-instruction
> > interrupt shadow that "sti" has? Because I'm not at all sure that is
> > true, and it's not documented as far as I can tell. In contrast, the
> > one-instruction shadow after "sti" very much _is_ documented.
> 
> Yeah, I'm pretty sure about this. The only instructions with an
> interrupt shadow are "sti", "mov ss" and "pop ss".
> 
> There may be specific microarchitectures that do it for a "popf" that
> enables interrupts too, but that is not documented _anywhere_ I could
> find.

So what about manipulating the stack so that the popf does not enable
interrupts and do an explicit sti to get the benefit of the
one-instruction shadow ?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/