Re: [RFC/HACK] x86: Fast return to kernel

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/04/2014 11:40 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> That said, regular *device* interrupts do often return to kernel 
>>> mode (the idle loop in particular), so if you have any way to 
>>> measure that, that might be interesting, and might show some of 
>>> the same advantages.
>>
>> I can try something awful involving measuring latency of 
>> hardware-timed packets on a SolarFlare card, but I'll have 
>> calibration issues.  I suppose I could see if 'ping' gets faster.  
>> In general, this will speed up interrupts that wake userspace from 
>> idle by about 100ns on my box, since it's presumably the same size 
>> and the speedup per loop in my silly benchmark.
> 
> To simulate high rate device IRQ you can generate very high frequency 
> lapic IRQs by using hrtimers, that's generating a ton of per CPU lapic 
> IRQs.
> 

The bigger question is if that helps in measuring the actual latency.
It should get more data points, to be sure.

Maybe let userspace sit in a tight loop doing RDTSC, and look for data
points too far apart to have been uninterrupted?

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/