Re: [PATCH] plist: replace pr_debug with printk in plist_test()

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon,  5 May 2014 10:43:05 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Replace pr_debug() in lib/plist.c test function plist_test() with
> printk(KERN_DEBUG ...).
> 
> Without DEBUG defined, pr_debug() is complied out, but the entire
> plist_test() function is already inside CONFIG_DEBUG_PI_LIST, so
> printk should just be used directly.
>
> --- a/lib/plist.c
> +++ b/lib/plist.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int  __init plist_test(void)
>  	int nr_expect = 0, i, loop;
>  	unsigned int r = local_clock();
>  
> -	pr_debug("start plist test\n");
> +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "start plist test\n");

Now someone will come along and helpfully switch it back to pr_debug()
again :(

What about adding a #define DEBUG?



This aspect of pr_debug() is rather surprising and unfortunate and I
guess we screwed it up.  pr_debug() should unconditionally do the
printk, just like pr_warn, pr_emerg, etc.  And there should be a
separate pr_debug_cond() which honours the DEBUG setting.

akpm3:/usr/src/linux-3.15-rc4> grep -r pr_debug . | wc -l
10286

Boy, that's going to be a big patch ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/