[PATCH v5 1/4] x86: fix list/memory corruption on CPU hotplug
From: Igor Mammedov
Date: Mon May 05 2014 - 16:52:08 EST
currently if AP wake up is failed, master CPU marks AP as not present
in do_boot_cpu() by calling set_cpu_present(cpu, false).
That leads to following list corruption on the next physical CPU
hotplug:
[ 418.107336] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 45 at lib/list_debug.c:33 __list_add+0xbe/0xd0()
[ 418.115268] list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (ffff88003dc57600), but was ffff88003e20c3a0. (prev=ffff88003e20c3a0).
[ 418.123693] Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast ipt_MASQUERADE ip6t_REJECT ipt_REJECT cfg80211 xt_conntrack rfkill ee
[ 418.138979] CPU: 1 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u10:1 Not tainted 3.14.0-rc6+ #387
[ 418.149989] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2007
[ 418.165750] Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn
[ 418.166433] 0000000000000021 ffff880038ca7988 ffffffff8159b22d 0000000000000021
[ 418.176460] ffff880038ca79d8 ffff880038ca79c8 ffffffff8106942c ffff880038ca79e8
[ 418.177453] ffff88003e20c3a0 ffff88003dc57600 ffff88003e20c3a0 00000000ffffffea
[ 418.178445] Call Trace:
[ 418.185811] [<ffffffff8159b22d>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5c
[ 418.186440] [<ffffffff8106942c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
[ 418.187192] [<ffffffff81069516>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
[ 418.191231] [<ffffffff8136ef51>] ? acpi_ns_get_node+0xb7/0xc7
[ 418.193889] [<ffffffff812f796e>] __list_add+0xbe/0xd0
[ 418.196649] [<ffffffff812e2aa9>] kobject_add_internal+0x79/0x200
[ 418.208610] [<ffffffff812e2e18>] kobject_add_varg+0x38/0x60
[ 418.213831] [<ffffffff812e2ef4>] kobject_add+0x44/0x70
[ 418.229961] [<ffffffff813e2c60>] device_add+0xd0/0x550
[ 418.234991] [<ffffffff813f0e95>] ? pm_runtime_init+0xe5/0xf0
[ 418.250226] [<ffffffff813e32be>] device_register+0x1e/0x30
[ 418.255296] [<ffffffff813e82a3>] register_cpu+0xe3/0x130
[ 418.266539] [<ffffffff81592be5>] arch_register_cpu+0x65/0x150
[ 418.285845] [<ffffffff81355c0d>] acpi_processor_hotadd_init+0x5a/0x9b
...
Which is caused by the fact that generic_processor_info() allocates
logical CPU id by calling:
cpu = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_present_mask);
which returns id of previously failed to wake up CPU, since its bit
is cleared by do_boot_cpu() and as result register_cpu() tries to
register another CPU with the same id as already present but failed
to be onlined CPU.
Taking in account that AP will not do anything if master CPU failed to
wake it up, there is no reason to mark that AP as not present and
break next cpu hotplug attempts. As a side effect of not marking AP
as not present, user would be allowed to online it again later.
--
Also fix memory corruption in acpi_unmap_lsapic()
if during CPU hotplug master CPU failed to wake up AP
it set percpu x86_cpu_to_apicid to BAD_APICID=0xFFFF for AP.
However following attempt to unplug that CPU will lead to
out of bound write access to __apicid_to_node[] which is
32768 items long on x86_64 kernel.
So with above fix of cpu_present_mask make sure that a present
CPU has a valid APIC ID by not setting x86_cpu_to_apicid
to BAD_APICID in do_boot_cpu() on failure and allow
acpi_processor_remove()->acpi_unmap_lsapic() cleanly remove CPU.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
---
v2:
- squash "[v4 2/5] x86: fix memory corruption in acpi_unmap_lsapic()"
into "[v4 1/5] x86: fix list corruption on CPU hotplug"
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 3482693..2988f69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -859,9 +859,6 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
/* was set by cpu_init() */
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask);
-
- set_cpu_present(cpu, false);
- per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu) = BAD_APICID;
}
/* mark "stuck" area as not stuck */
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/