Re: [PATCH 0/2] namespaces: log namespaces per task
From: Richard Guy Briggs
Date: Mon May 05 2014 - 17:48:36 EST
On 14/05/05, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting James Bottomley (James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:12 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Questions:
> > > Is there a way to link serial numbers of namespaces involved in migration of a
> > > container to another kernel? (I had a brief look at CRIU.) Is there a unique
> > > identifier for each running instance of a kernel? Or at least some identifier
> > > within the container migration realm?
> >
> > Are you asking for a way of distinguishing an migrated container from an
> > unmigrated one? The answer is pretty much "no" because the job of
> > migration is to restore to the same state as much as possible.
> >
> > Reading between the lines, I think your goal is to correlate audit
> > information across a container migration, right? Ideally the management
> > system should be able to cough up an audit trail for a container
> > wherever it's running and however many times it's been migrated?
> >
> > In that case, I think your idea of a numeric serial number in a dense
> > range is wrong. Because the range is dense you're obviously never going
> > to be able to use the same serial number across a migration. However,
>
> Ah, but I was being silly before, we can actually address this pretty
> simply. If we just (for instance) add
> /proc/self/ns/{ic,mnt,net,pid,user,uts}_seq containing the serial number
> for the relevant ns for the task, then criu can dump this info at
> checkpoint. Then at restart it can dump an audit message per task and
> ns saying old_serial=%x,new_serial=%x. That way the audit log reader
> can if it cares keep track.
This is the sort of idea I had in mind...
> -serge
>
> (Another, more heavyweight approach would be to track all ns hierarchies
> and make the serial numbers per-namespace-instance. So my container's
> pidns serial might be 0x2, and if it clones a new pidns that would be
> "(0x2,0x1)" on the host, or just 0x1 inside the container. But we don't
> need that if the simple userspace approach suffices)
This sounds manageable...
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/