[PATCH v2] w1: do not unlock unheld list_mutex in __w1_remove_master_device()
From: Alexey Khoroshilov
Date: Tue May 06 2014 - 17:26:27 EST
w1_process_callbacks() expects to be called with dev->list_mutex held,
but it is the fact only in w1_process(). __w1_remove_master_device()
calls w1_process_callbacks() after it releases list_mutex.
The patch fixes __w1_remove_master_device() to acquire list_mutex
for w1_process_callbacks().
Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/w1/w1.c | 2 ++
drivers/w1/w1_int.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1.c b/drivers/w1/w1.c
index ff52618cafbe..5d7341520544 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/w1.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/w1.c
@@ -1078,6 +1078,8 @@ static void w1_search_process(struct w1_master *dev, u8 search_type)
* w1_process_callbacks() - execute each dev->async_list callback entry
* @dev: w1_master device
*
+ * The w1 master list_mutex must be held.
+ *
* Return: 1 if there were commands to executed 0 otherwise
*/
int w1_process_callbacks(struct w1_master *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1_int.c b/drivers/w1/w1_int.c
index 9b084db739c7..728039d2efe1 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/w1_int.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/w1_int.c
@@ -219,9 +219,13 @@ void __w1_remove_master_device(struct w1_master *dev)
if (msleep_interruptible(1000))
flush_signals(current);
+ mutex_lock(&dev->list_mutex);
w1_process_callbacks(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->list_mutex);
}
+ mutex_lock(&dev->list_mutex);
w1_process_callbacks(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->list_mutex);
memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
msg.id.mst.id = dev->id;
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/