[PATCH 3.11 12/70] irqchip: Gic: Support forced affinity setting

[Luis Henriques]

3.11.10.10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit ffde1de64012c406dfdda8690918248b472f24e4 upstream.

To support the affinity setting of per cpu timers in the early startup
of a not yet online cpu, implement the force logic, which disables the
cpu online check.

Tagged for stable to allow a simple fix of the affected SoC clock
event drivers.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140416143315.916984416@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index ee7c503..0ebd24d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -246,10 +246,14 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 			    bool force)
 {
 	void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
-	unsigned int shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
-	unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
+	unsigned int cpu, shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
 	u32 val, mask, bit;
 
+	if (!force)
+		cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
+	else
+		cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
+
 	if (cpu >= NR_GIC_CPU_IF || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/