[PATCH] sched: Use clamp() and clamp_val() to make it more readable.

[Dongsheng Yang]

As Kees suggested, I use clamp() function to replace the if and
else branch, making it more readable and modular.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 11 ++---------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index ff871f5..79f8638 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3039,17 +3039,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(nice, int, increment)
 	 * We don't have to worry. Conceptually one call occurs first
 	 * and we have a single winner.
 	 */
-	if (increment < -40)
-		increment = -40;
-	if (increment > 40)
-		increment = 40;
-
+	increment = clamp(increment, -NICE_WIDTH, NICE_WIDTH);
 	nice = task_nice(current) + increment;
-	if (nice < MIN_NICE)
-		nice = MIN_NICE;
-	if (nice > MAX_NICE)
-		nice = MAX_NICE;
 
+	nice = clamp_val(nice, MIN_NICE, MAX_NICE);
 	if (increment < 0 && !can_nice(current, nice))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-- 
1.8.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/