Re: + printk-print-initial-logbuf-contents-before-re-enabling-interrupts.patch added to -mm tree

[Jan Kara]

On Thu 08-05-14 15:34:07, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> 
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 05:41:51PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > Possibly, but I fear we'd incur the wrath of Alan after reading that other
> > > thread. Having a CONFIG_ option or similar to control the amount of printing
> > > we do is very similar to the command-line option Jan proposed in his series.
> > 
> > I've nothing against a configuration option, and having a printk that
> > queued most stuff to the serial IRQ handler on overflow and a boot option
> > of printk=synchronous for debug work would be awesome in my book. Many end
> > production boxes don't give a toss about losing the odd bit of data they
> > just need to shift the logs somewhere for filing.
> 
> Ok, I'll revisit this with a command-line option for the debug case. Thanks.
> 
> > All these "clever" approaches just seem to me to be ever more convoluted
> > attempts to fail to deal with the simple reality that if you put more
> > down the sewage pipe than fits it has to overflow somewhere.
> >
> > Our tty drivers have a fifo, our tty drivers have an IRQ driven write
> > operation. It seems silly to be adding magic to solve the problem rather
> > than just using it (and in turn getting a ton of other consoles for free,
> > and being able to take GregKH's current usb console hack out)
> 
> Hmm, I'm not at all familiar with the tty layer, so I'd have to go and take
> a look. Jan, did you look at this at all?
  No. I know nothing about tty layer as well so this research task is
currently on a backburner...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/