Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: DEBUG_VM checks for free_list placement of CMA and RESERVE pages

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:34:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2014 15:19:37 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > I also think that VM_DEBUG overhead isn't problem because of same
> > > reason from Vlastimil.
> > 
> > Guys, please read this.
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/17/591
> > 
> > If you guys really want it, we could separate it with
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_CMA or CONFIG_DEBUG_RESERVE like stuff.
> > Otherwise, just remain in mmotm.
> 
> Wise words, those.
> 
> Yes, these checks are in a pretty hot path.  I'm inclined to make the
> patch -mm (and -next) only.
> 
> Unless there's a really good reason, such as "nobody who uses CMA is
> likely to be testing -next", which sounds likely :(

Hello,

Now, I think that dropping this patch is better if we can only use it
on MIGRATE_CMA case. Later, if I feel that this case should be checked,
I will resend the patch with appropriate argument.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/