Re: [PATCH v1 09/11] mmc: mmci: Add clock support for Qualcomm.

From: Srinivas Kandagatla
Date: Tue May 13 2014 - 05:39:29 EST


Thanks Linus W,

On 13/05/14 09:28, Linus Walleij wrote:
code is conditioned on hw designer.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
(...)
+ if (host->hw_designer == AMBA_VENDOR_QCOM) {
+ host->cclk = host->mclk;
+ } else if (desired >= host->mclk) {

Again refrain from hard-checking the vendor everywhere.

struct variant_data {
bool qcom_cclk_is_mclk;
(...)

Got it.. Will fix it in next version.
As per example from st_clkdiv...

Then

if (host->vendor->qcom_cclk_is_mclk) {
(...)
}

+ if (ios->clock != host->mclk &&
+ host->hw_designer == AMBA_VENDOR_QCOM) {
+ /* Qcom MCLKCLK register does not define bypass bits */
+ int rc = clk_set_rate(host->clk, ios->clock);
+ if (rc < 0) {
+ dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
+ "Error setting clock rate (%d)\n", rc);
+ } else {
+ host->mclk = clk_get_rate(host->clk);
+ host->cclk = host->mclk;
+ }
+ }

For this I would define a vendor data like:

struct variant_data {
bool explicit_mclk_control;
(...)
This looks good.

Or something. It explains what is actually going on.

if (plat->f_max)
- mmc->f_max = min(host->mclk, plat->f_max);
+ mmc->f_max = (host->hw_designer == AMBA_VENDOR_QCOM) ?
+ plat->f_max : min(host->mclk, plat->f_max);

So rewrite like that:

if (host->vendor->explicit_mclk_control)
mmc->f_max = plat->f_max;
else
mmc->f_max = min(host->mclk, plat->f_max);


This looks much clean


Yours,
Linus Walleij

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/