Re: [BUG] sched_setattr() SCHED_DEADLINE hangs system

[Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)]

On 05/13/2014 02:11 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 12:43:07 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:57:49AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>>  static bool
>>>  __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
>>>  {
>>>  	return attr && attr->sched_deadline != 0 &&
>>>  		(attr->sched_period == 0 ||
>>> -		(s64)(attr->sched_period   - attr->sched_deadline) >= 0) &&
>>> -		(s64)(attr->sched_deadline - attr->sched_runtime ) >= 0  &&
>>> -		attr->sched_runtime >= (2 << (DL_SCALE - 1));
>>> +		(attr->sched_period >= attr->sched_deadline)) &&
>>> +		(attr->sched_deadline >= attr->sched_runtime) &&
>>> +		attr->sched_runtime >= (1ULL << DL_SCALE) &&
>>> +		(attr->sched_deadline < (1ULL << 63) &&
>>> +		attr->sched_period < (1ULL << 63));
>>>  }
>>
>> Could we maybe rewrite that function to look less like a ioccc.org
>> submission?
>>
> 
> Right.
> 
>> static bool
>> __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
>> {
>> 	if (!attr) /* possible at all? */
>> 		return false;
>>
> 
> I'd say no, removed.
> 
>> 	/* runtime <= deadline <= period */
>> 	if (attr->sched_period   < attr->sched_deadline ||
>> 	    attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
>> 		return false;
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * Since we truncate DL_SCALE bits make sure we're at least that big,
>> 	 * if runtime > (1 << DL_SCALE), so must the others be per the above
>> 	 */
>> 	if (attr->sched_runtime <= (1ULL << DL_SCALE))
>> 		return false;
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * Since we use the MSB for wrap-around and sign issues, make
>> 	 * sure its not set, if period < 2^63, so must the others be.
>> 	 */
>> 	if (attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
>> 		return false;
>>
>> 	return true;
>> }
>>
>> Did I miss anything?

Thanks so much for suggesting the rewrite. It was rather impenetrable before.

> period can be 0, so we have to check also sched_deadline for MSB set.

Yes, I spotted that too as I tested the patch.

Anyway, I tested your version of the patch, Peter, and other than the 
above problem, it works (and the error case I identified now fails with
EINVAL).

Cheers,

Michael


> ---
>>From e0c44d7614127f8dfbafc08c30681cb8098271e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:15:59 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: restrict user params max value to 2^63 ns
> 
> Michael Kerrisk noticed that creating SCHED_DEADLINE reservations
> with certain parameters (e.g, a runtime of something near 2^64 ns)
> can cause a system freeze for some amount of time.
> 
> The problem is that in the interface we have
> 
>  u64 sched_runtime;
> 
> while internally we need to have a signed runtime (to cope with
> budget overruns)
> 
>  s64 runtime;
> 
> At the time we setup a new dl_entity we copy the first value in
> the second. The cast turns out with negative values when
> sched_runtime is too big, and this causes the scheduler to go crazy
> right from the start.
> 
> Moreover, considering how we deal with deadlines wraparound
> 
>  (s64)(a - b) < 0
> 
> we also have to restrict acceptable values for sched_{deadline,period}.
> 
> This patch fixes the thing checking that user parameters are always
> below 2^63 ns (still large enough for everyone).
> 
> It also rewrites other conditions that we check, since in
> __checkparam_dl we don't have to deal with deadline wraparounds
> and what we have now erroneously fails when the difference between
> values is too big.
> 
> Reported-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index d9d8ece..682a986 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3188,17 +3188,40 @@ __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr)
>   * We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal
>   * than the runtime, as well as the period of being zero or
>   * greater than deadline. Furthermore, we have to be sure that
> - * user parameters are above the internal resolution (1us); we
> - * check sched_runtime only since it is always the smaller one.
> + * user parameters are above the internal resolution of 1us (we
> + * check sched_runtime only since it is always the smaller one) and
> + * below 2^63 ns (we have to check both sched_deadline and
> + * sched_period, as the latter can be zero).
>   */
>  static bool
>  __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
>  {
> -	return attr && attr->sched_deadline != 0 &&
> -		(attr->sched_period == 0 ||
> -		(s64)(attr->sched_period   - attr->sched_deadline) >= 0) &&
> -		(s64)(attr->sched_deadline - attr->sched_runtime ) >= 0  &&
> -		attr->sched_runtime >= (2 << (DL_SCALE - 1));
> +	/* deadline != 0 */
> +	if (attr->sched_deadline == 0)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since we truncate DL_SCALE bits, make sure we're at least
> +	 * that big.
> +	 */
> +	if (attr->sched_runtime < (1ULL << DL_SCALE))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since we use the MSB for wrap-around and sign issues, make
> +	 * sure it's not set (mind that period can be equal to zero).
> +	 */
> +	if (attr->sched_deadline & (1ULL << 63) ||
> +	    attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* runtime <= deadline <= period (if period != 0) */
> +	if ((attr->sched_period != 0 &&
> +	     attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline) ||
> +	    attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/