Re: [PATCH 06/20] arch,avr32: Fold atomic_ops

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:40:32PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> Probably found the reason why we want to use sub with the signed 21-bit
> limit, it uses one less register than the add instruction that can add up to
> 32-bit values.
> 
> Both instructions are 32-bit, to use a 16-bit instruction the immediate is
> very small; 4 bit.
> 
> sub 32-bit, type IV, takes a register and subtracts a 21-bit immediate.
> add 32-bit, type II, adds two register values together.
> 
> So by simplifying you loose this optimization.

OK, let me try if I can come up with anything sane for this.

Re, adding atomic_{or,and,xor}() those should all use the same bits as
add, right, except for the special case using sub.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/