Hi,okay will do in v2.
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:03:03PM +0530, George Cherian wrote:
Calculate the wrapper register offsets in a seperate function.can you add a patch before $subject which gets rid of the switch
Improve code readability, decrease the dwc3_probe() size.
Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
index 1160ff4..872f065 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
@@ -383,6 +383,49 @@ static int dwc3_omap_vbus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void dwc3_omap_map_offset(struct dwc3_omap *omap)
+{
+ u32 reg;
+ struct device_node *node = omap->dev->of_node;
+ int x_major;
+
+ reg = dwc3_omap_readl(omap->base, USBOTGSS_REVISION);
+ omap->revision = reg;
+ x_major = USBOTGSS_REVISION_XMAJOR(reg);
+
+ /* Differentiate between OMAP5 and AM437x */
+ switch (x_major) {
+ case USBOTGSS_REVISION_XMAJOR1:
+ case USBOTGSS_REVISION_XMAJOR2:
+ omap->irq_eoi_offset = 0;
+ omap->irq0_offset = 0;
+ omap->irqmisc_offset = 0;
+ omap->utmi_otg_offset = 0;
+ omap->debug_offset = 0;
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* Default to the latest revision */
+ omap->irq_eoi_offset = USBOTGSS_EOI_OFFSET;
+ omap->irq0_offset = USBOTGSS_IRQ0_OFFSET;
+ omap->irqmisc_offset = USBOTGSS_IRQMISC_OFFSET;
+ omap->utmi_otg_offset = USBOTGSS_UTMI_OTG_OFFSET;
+ omap->debug_offset = USBOTGSS_DEBUG_OFFSET;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* For OMAP5(ES2.0) and AM437x x_major is 2 even though there are
+ * changes in wrapper registers, Using dt compatible for aegis
+ */
+
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "ti,am437x-dwc3")) {
+ omap->irq_eoi_offset = USBOTGSS_EOI_OFFSET;
+ omap->irq0_offset = USBOTGSS_IRQ0_OFFSET;
+ omap->irqmisc_offset = USBOTGSS_IRQMISC_OFFSET;
+ omap->utmi_otg_offset = USBOTGSS_UTMI_OTG_OFFSET;
+ omap->debug_offset = USBOTGSS_DEBUG_OFFSET;
+ }
statement above since it's pretty much useless now that we use
compatible strings to differentiate omap5 and am437x ?'