Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] phy: add a driver for the Berlin SATA PHY

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I]

Hi,

On Wednesday 14 May 2014 03:18 PM, Antoine TÃnart wrote:
> The Berlin SoC has a two SATA ports. Add a PHY driver to handle them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antoine TÃnart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/Kconfig           |   5 ++
>  drivers/phy/Makefile          |   1 +
>  drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 186 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> index 4906c27fa3bd..b31b1986fda4 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ config GENERIC_PHY
>  	  phy users can obtain reference to the PHY. All the users of this
>  	  framework should select this config.
>  
> +config PHY_BERLIN_SATA
> +	bool
> +	depends on ARCH_BERLIN && OF
> +	select GENERIC_PHY
> +
>  config PHY_EXYNOS_MIPI_VIDEO
>  	tristate "S5P/EXYNOS SoC series MIPI CSI-2/DSI PHY driver"
>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> index 7728518572a4..40278706ac1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  #
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY)		+= phy-core.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_BERLIN_SATA)		+= phy-berlin-sata.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_KONA_USB2_PHY)		+= phy-bcm-kona-usb2.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_DP_VIDEO)	+= phy-exynos-dp-video.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_MIPI_VIDEO)	+= phy-exynos-mipi-video.o
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b08f76329a34
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
> +/*
> + * Marvell Berlin SATA PHY driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
> + *
> + * Antoine TÃnart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#define HOST_VSA_ADDR		0x0
> +#define HOST_VSA_DATA		0x4
> +
> +#define CONTROL_REGISTER	0x0
> +#define MBUS_SIZE_CONTROL	0x4
> +
> +#define POWER_DOWN_SATA0		BIT(6)
> +#define POWER_DOWN_SATA1		BIT(14)
> +#define MBUS_WRITE_REQUEST_SIZE_128	(BIT(2) << 16)
> +#define MBUS_READ_REQUEST_SIZE_128	(BIT(2) << 19)
> +
> +#define BERLIN_SATA_PHY_NB	2
> +
> +#define to_berlin_sata_phy_priv(desc)	\
> +	container_of((desc), struct phy_berlin_priv, phys[(desc)->index])
> +
> +struct phy_berlin_desc {
> +	struct phy	*phy;
> +	u32		val;
> +	unsigned	index;
> +};
> +
> +struct phy_berlin_priv {
> +	void __iomem	*base;
> +	spinlock_t	lock;
> +	struct phy_berlin_desc	phys[BERLIN_SATA_PHY_NB];

Can't we do away with hardcoding BERLIN_SATA_PHY_NB?
> +};
> +
> +static int phy_berlin_sata_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> +	struct phy_berlin_desc *desc = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +	struct phy_berlin_priv *priv = to_berlin_sata_phy_priv(desc);
> +	u32 regval;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	/* Power up PHY */
> +	writel(CONTROL_REGISTER, priv->base + HOST_VSA_ADDR);
> +	regval = readl(priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +	regval &= ~(desc->val);
> +	writel(regval, priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +
> +	/* Configure MBus */
> +	writel(MBUS_SIZE_CONTROL, priv->base + HOST_VSA_ADDR);
> +	regval = readl(priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +	regval |= MBUS_WRITE_REQUEST_SIZE_128 | MBUS_READ_REQUEST_SIZE_128;
> +	writel(regval, priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int phy_berlin_sata_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> +	struct phy_berlin_desc *desc = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +	struct phy_berlin_priv *priv = to_berlin_sata_phy_priv(desc);
> +	u32 regval;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	/* Power down PHY */
> +	writel(CONTROL_REGISTER, priv->base + HOST_VSA_ADDR);
> +	regval = readl(priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +	regval |= desc->val;
> +	writel(regval, priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct phy_ops phy_berlin_sata_ops = {
> +	.power_on	= phy_berlin_sata_power_on,
> +	.power_off	= phy_berlin_sata_power_off,
> +	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static struct phy_berlin_desc desc[] = {
> +	{ .val = POWER_DOWN_SATA0 },
> +	{ .val = POWER_DOWN_SATA1 },
> +	{ },
> +};
> +
> +static int phy_berlin_sata_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct phy *phy;
> +	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> +	struct phy_berlin_priv *priv;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +	u8 phy_id;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	priv->base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
> +	spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
> +		if (of_property_read_u8(child, "reg", &phy_id))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		if (phy_id >= BERLIN_SATA_PHY_NB) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "invalid reg in node %s\n", child->name);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		phy = devm_phy_create(dev, &phy_berlin_sata_ops, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY for node %s\n",
> +				child->name);
> +			return PTR_ERR(phy);
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * By default the PHY node is used to request and match a PHY.
> +		 * We describe one PHY per sub-node here. Use the right node.
> +		 */
> +		phy->dev.of_node = child;
> +
> +		priv->phys[phy_id].phy = phy;
> +		priv->phys[phy_id].val = desc[phy_id].val;
> +		priv->phys[phy_id].index = phy_id;
> +		phy_set_drvdata(phy, &priv->phys[phy_id]);
> +
> +		/* Make sure the PHY is off */
> +		phy_berlin_sata_power_off(phy);
> +
> +		phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(&phy->dev,
> +							     of_phy_simple_xlate);
> +		if (IS_ERR(phy_provider))
> +			return PTR_ERR(phy_provider);

was this intentional? registering multiple PHY providers?

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/