Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing filesystems
From: Jan Kara
Date: Wed May 14 2014 - 07:39:52 EST
On Wed 14-05-14 13:26:21, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:14:49PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 14-05-14 00:04:43, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available.
> > >
> > > While here remove code duplication with MS_RDONLY case and fix a
> > > whitespace nit.
> > I'm somewhat undecided here I have to say. On one hand I don't like
> > printing to kernel log when everything is fine and kernel is operating
> > normally. On the other hand I've seen quite a few cases where people have
> > shot themselves in the foot with filesystem freezing so having some trace
> > of this in the log doesn't seem like a completely bad thing either. What do
> > other people think?
> >
>
> I would like to note that the kernel already prints messages when e.g.
> filesystems get mounted.
Yeah, that's a fair point.
> And yes, situations where I/O is frozen and hung task detector comes into
> play happen more often than you may think. I can hide these behind a
> sysctl if this helps.
No, I don't think hiding behind sysctl is really needed.
> Finally, somewhat related to the first mail, my preferred message format
> (which I was somewhat reluctant to propose earlier) would be:
>
> VFS (%s): Filesystem frozen by %s:%d
>
> with device, process and pid respectively.
More common seems to be "%s (%d)" for process & pid but whatever. I like
the format change.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/