Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq_work: Implement remote queueing

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:51:19PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Anyway, if it turns out to really be needed, the split list doesn't
> > sound bad.
> 
> Either that or we can remove LAZY stuff and wait to see if people complain :)

How big do we need tested? I'm fairly sure RHT has some medium silly
boxes to run things on.

Attachment: pgp0o893HFR73.pgp
Description: PGP signature