Re: [PATCH 1/3] bus: add Broadcom GISB arbiter bus timeout/error handler

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 14 May 2014 12:10:46 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> This patch adds support for the Broadcom GISB arbiter bus timeout/error
> handler. GISB is a proprietary bus used by Broadcom Set Top Box
> System-on-a-chip devices (BCM7xxx) which allows multiple masters and
> clients to be interfaced with each other.
> 
> The bus arbiter offers support for generating two interrupts towards the
> host CPU, thus allowing us to "catch" clock gated masters, or masters
> being volontarily blocked for powersaving purposes, or do general system
> troubleshooting.
> 
> We also register a hook with the ARM fault exception handling to allow
> printing a more informative message than "imprecise external abort at
> 0x00000000" for instance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>

Looks pretty good to me.

> +static int brcmstb_gisb_arb_decode_addr(struct brcmstb_gisb_arb_device *gdev,
> +					const char *reason)
> +{
> +	u32 cap_status;
> +	unsigned long arb_addr;
> +	u32 master;
> +	const char *m_name;
> +	char m_fmt[11];
> +
> +	cap_status = ioread32(gdev->base + ARB_ERR_CAP_STATUS);
> +
> +	/* Invalid captured address, bail out */
> +	if (!(cap_status & ARB_ERR_CAP_STATUS_VALID))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	/* Read the address and master */
> +	arb_addr = ioread32(gdev->base + ARB_ERR_CAP_ADDR) & 0xffffffff;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> +	arb_addr |= (u64)ioread32(gdev->base + ARB_ERR_CAP_HI_ADDR) << 32;
> +#endif

Can you use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT))' here, or does that
cause a warning?

> +static int brcmstb_bus_error_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
> +				     struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct brcmstb_gisb_arb_device *gdev;
> +
> +	/* iterate over each GISB arb registered handlers */
> +	list_for_each_entry(gdev, &brcmstb_gisb_arb_device_list, next)
> +		ret |= brcmstb_gisb_arb_decode_addr(gdev, "bus error");
> +	/*
> +	 * If it was an imprecise abort, then we need to correct the
> +	 * return address to be _after_ the instruction.
> +	*/
> +	if (fsr & (1 << 10))
> +		regs->ARM_pc += 4;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

This will cause the normal abort handler to trigger if the GISB
arbiter doesn't know what happened, right?

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/