Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: don't try to balance rt_runtime when it is futile

[Mike Galbraith]

On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:44 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> In practice, not sure how much testing CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y has received
> for -rt kernels in production environments.

I took 3.14-rt out for a quick spin on my 64 core box, it didn't work at
all with 60 cores isolated.  I didn't have time to rummage, but it looks
like there are still bugs to squash. 

Biggest problem with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is the price tag.  It just raped
fast mover performance last time I measured.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/