Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: discard duplicate OPP additions

[Viresh Kumar]

On 15 May 2014 11:16, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think I did not make myself clear.

Probably I was the one who got confused :)

> Devfreq will have its own opp table associated with its own device. It
> does not uses the opp table of cpus.
> Hence there may be need to free the table if driver (at least devfreq)
> getting un-registered.

We may have an unregister routine routine, I am not arguing about that.
But we don't need to call that for CPU's opp, that's it.. For devices it might
make sense to free memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/