Re: [RFC] cpufreq: send notifications for intermediate (stable) frequencies

[Viresh Kumar]

On 16 May 2014 00:47, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This seems rather complex. Can't either the driver or the cpufreq core
> be responsible for all of the notifications? Otherwise, the logic gets
> rather complex, and spread between the core and the driver.

I do agree about that and that's why added that 'ugly' statement.

> Perhaps the core should make separate calls into the driver to switch to
> the temporary frequency and the final frequency, so it can manage all
> the notifications. Probably best to use a separate function pointer for
> the temporary change so the driver can easily know what it's doing.

Hmm, that sounds like a much better approach. Let me try to code it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/