Re: [PATCH 2/6] Revert "perf: Disable PERF_RECORD_MMAP2 support"
From: Don Zickus
Date: Fri May 16 2014 - 09:27:08 EST
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:48:13PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > - /*
> > - * Anon maps don't have the execname.
> > - */
> > - if (n < 4)
> > + n = sscanf(bf, "%"PRIx64"-%"PRIx64" %s %"PRIx64" %x:%x %u %s\n",
> > + &event->mmap2.start, &event->mmap2.len, prot,
> > + &event->mmap2.pgoff, &event->mmap2.maj,
> > + &event->mmap2.min,
> > + &ino, execname);
> > +
> > + event->mmap2.ino = (u64)ino;
> > +
> > + if (n < 7)
> > continue;
>
> any reason for changing this from 'if (n != 8)' ?
Yes, read 9d4ecc8893832337daf241236841db966fa53489. :-)
This wasn't a clean revert because of the change for (n != 5) -> (n < 4).
So I maintainted the spirit of the upstream code with this revert. Let me
know if that is wrong.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/