Re: 3.14.4 Kernel BUG at fs/namei.c : KDE's kate + ecryptfs + BTRFS + LVM2 + LUKS

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

On 05/16/2014 06:36 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Underlying is ecryptfs over BTRFS over LVM2 over LUKS (what else ?)

I recently switched one of my drives to BTRFS because I wanted
transparent compression. Since I also needed encryption, I chose:

BTRFS => LUKS (Device Mapper) => SCSI Block.

Is there any value having LVM2 and ecryptfs in the way you have stacked
? Just curious.

-- 
Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me
in replies for quicker response

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/