Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: don't try to balance rt_runtime when it is futile
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon May 19 2014 - 06:54:29 EST
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:18:51AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:44 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > In practice, not sure how much testing CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y has received
> > for -rt kernels in production environments.
>
> I took 3.14-rt out for a quick spin on my 64 core box, it didn't work at
> all with 60 cores isolated. I didn't have time to rummage, but it looks
> like there are still bugs to squash.
>
> Biggest problem with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is the price tag. It just raped
> fast mover performance last time I measured.
Syscall entry and exit times are through the roof with it. So anything
doing loads of syscalls will suffer badly.
Attachment:
pgp2pKuiHH_4J.pgp
Description: PGP signature