Re: [PATCH 06/20] perf tools: Consolidate output field handling to hpp format routines

[Namhyung Kim]

2014-05-19 (ì), 15:12 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:25:48PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> > @@ -1104,27 +1104,35 @@ static int hist_browser__fprintf_entry(struct hist_browser *browser,
> >  				       struct hist_entry *he, FILE *fp)
> >  {
> >  	char s[8192];
> > -	double percent;
> >  	int printed = 0;
> >  	char folded_sign = ' ';
> > +	struct perf_hpp hpp = {
> > +		.buf = s,
> > +		.size = sizeof(s),
> > +	};
> > +	struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt;
> > +	bool first = true;
> > +	int ret;
> >  
> >  	if (symbol_conf.use_callchain)
> >  		folded_sign = hist_entry__folded(he);
> >  
> > -	hist_entry__sort_snprintf(he, s, sizeof(s), browser->hists);
> > -	percent = (he->stat.period * 100.0) / browser->hists->stats.total_period;
> > -
> >  	if (symbol_conf.use_callchain)
> >  		printed += fprintf(fp, "%c ", folded_sign);
> >  
> > -	printed += fprintf(fp, " %5.2f%%", percent);
> > -
> > -	if (symbol_conf.show_nr_samples)
> > -		printed += fprintf(fp, " %11u", he->stat.nr_events);
> > +	perf_hpp__for_each_format(fmt) {
> > +		if (perf_hpp__should_skip(fmt))
> > +			continue;
> 
> this one is defined in later patch, so it breaks build in this one

Argh, right.  This one came from a later fixup with interactive rebase
and missed test..  I'll fix and resend, sorry about that.

Thanks,
Namhyung



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/