Re: [PATCH 2/5] usb: gadget: net2280: Use S_I macros

From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Date: Mon May 19 2014 - 15:36:25 EST


Hello Alan

What about using octal notation in all the file and merge the patch
with the other big patch of the series? I am trying to have some
consistency in the file :)


Thanks!

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>
>> Instead of octal notation, to be consistent around the file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c
>> index c3205ec..5b2ab68 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c
>> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ module_param(use_msi, bool, S_IRUGO);
>> static ushort fifo_mode = 0;
>>
>> /* "modprobe net2280 fifo_mode=1" etc */
>> -module_param (fifo_mode, ushort, 0644);
>> +module_param(fifo_mode, ushort, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>
> I don't think this is necessary, in and of itself. In my opinion, the
> macros are a lot harder to figure out than the octal values.
>
> Don't bother making this change. It's useless churn.
>
> Alan Stern
>



--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/