[PATCH] lpfc: Use time_after()

[Manuel SchÃlling]

To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified
to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.

Signed-off-by: Manuel SchÃlling <manuel.schoelling@xxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index 462453e..fb5351a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -380,12 +380,14 @@ lpfc_rampdown_queue_depth(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	uint32_t evt_posted;
+	unsigned long expires;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 	atomic_inc(&phba->num_rsrc_err);
 	phba->last_rsrc_error_time = jiffies;
 
-	if ((phba->last_ramp_down_time + QUEUE_RAMP_DOWN_INTERVAL) > jiffies) {
+	expires = phba->last_ramp_down_time + QUEUE_RAMP_DOWN_INTERVAL;
+	if (time_after(expires, jiffies)) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/