Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Battery: Accelerate battery resume callback

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon May 19 2014 - 18:37:35 EST


On Sunday, May 04, 2014 02:07:06 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> Most time of battery resume callback is spent on executing AML code
> _BTP, _BIF and _BIF to get battery info, status and set alarm. These
> AML methods may access EC operation regions several times and consumes
> time.
>
> These operations are not necessary during devices resume and can run
> during POST_SUSPEND/HIBERNATION event when all processes are thawed.
>
> This also can avoid removing and adding battery sysfs nodes every system
> resume even if the battery unit is not actually changed. The original code
> updates sysfs nodes without check and this seems not reasonable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>

Queued up for 3.16, thanks!

> ---
> This patch is to base on the linux pm tree linux-next branch with
> patches "ACPI: Revert "ACPI / Battery: Remove battery's proc directory""
> and "ACPI: Revert "ACPI: Remove CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER and cm_sbsc.c"".
>
> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> index 6e7b2a1..3b4921e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_quirks(struct acpi_battery *battery)
> }
> }
>
> -static int acpi_battery_update(struct acpi_battery *battery)
> +static int acpi_battery_update(struct acpi_battery *battery, bool resume)
> {
> int result, old_present = acpi_battery_present(battery);
> result = acpi_battery_get_status(battery);
> @@ -707,6 +707,10 @@ static int acpi_battery_update(struct acpi_battery *battery)
> battery->update_time = 0;
> return 0;
> }
> +
> + if (resume)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (!battery->update_time ||
> old_present != acpi_battery_present(battery)) {
> result = acpi_battery_get_info(battery);
> @@ -915,7 +919,7 @@ static print_func acpi_print_funcs[ACPI_BATTERY_NUMFILES] = {
> static int acpi_battery_read(int fid, struct seq_file *seq)
> {
> struct acpi_battery *battery = seq->private;
> - int result = acpi_battery_update(battery);
> + int result = acpi_battery_update(battery, false);
> return acpi_print_funcs[fid](seq, result);
> }
>
> @@ -1030,7 +1034,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> old = battery->bat.dev;
> if (event == ACPI_BATTERY_NOTIFY_INFO)
> acpi_battery_refresh(battery);
> - acpi_battery_update(battery);
> + acpi_battery_update(battery, false);
> acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event(device->pnp.device_class,
> dev_name(&device->dev), event,
> acpi_battery_present(battery));
> @@ -1045,13 +1049,27 @@ static int battery_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> {
> struct acpi_battery *battery = container_of(nb, struct acpi_battery,
> pm_nb);
> + int result;
> +
> switch (mode) {
> case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> - if (battery->bat.dev) {
> - sysfs_remove_battery(battery);
> - sysfs_add_battery(battery);
> - }
> + if (!acpi_battery_present(battery))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!battery->bat.dev) {
> + result = acpi_battery_get_info(battery);
> + if (result)
> + return result;
> +
> + result = sysfs_add_battery(battery);
> + if (result)
> + return result;
> + } else
> + acpi_battery_refresh(battery);
> +
> + acpi_battery_init_alarm(battery);
> + acpi_battery_get_state(battery);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -1087,7 +1105,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> mutex_init(&battery->sysfs_lock);
> if (acpi_has_method(battery->device->handle, "_BIX"))
> set_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, &battery->flags);
> - result = acpi_battery_update(battery);
> + result = acpi_battery_update(battery, false);
> if (result)
> goto fail;
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
> @@ -1149,7 +1167,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_resume(struct device *dev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> battery->update_time = 0;
> - acpi_battery_update(battery);
> + acpi_battery_update(battery, true);
> return 0;
> }
> #else
>

--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/