Re: [tip:locking/core] rwsem: Support optimistic spinning

From: Jason Low
Date: Mon May 19 2014 - 19:14:28 EST


On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 14:47 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> Andrew had put this patch in -next for a while, and Stephen Rothwell was
>> able to trigger some warnings: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/19/627
>>
>> 8<----------------------------------------------------------------
>> From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
>> Subject: [PATCH] rwsem: Fix warnings for CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK
>>
>> Optimistic spinning is only used by the xadd variant
>> of rw-semaphores. Make sure that we use the old version
>> of the __RWSEM_INITIALIZER macro for systems that rely
>> on the spinlock one, otherwise warnings can be triggered,
>> such as the following reported on an arm box:
>>
>> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: excess elements in struct initializer [enabled by default]
>> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: (near initialization for 'ipcns_chain.rwsem') [enabled by default]
>> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: excess elements in struct initializer [enabled by default]
>> ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: (near initialization for 'ipcns_chain.rwsem') [enabled by default]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/rwsem.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
>> index 3e108f1..091d993 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>> # define __RWSEM_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
>> #endif
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM)
>
> Of course, we can also use the following. I have no preference.
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK)

So if given the choice between the 2, I think checking
!CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK is better just because we use that to
decide the implementation/structure layout.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/