Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] mm: FAULT_AROUND_ORDER patchset performance data for powerpc

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Shouldn't FAULT_AROUND_ORDER and fault_around_order be changed to be
> the order of the fault-around size in bytes, and fault_around_pages()
> use 1UL << (fault_around_order - PAGE_SHIFT)

Yes.  And shame on me for missing it (this time!) at review.

There's still time to fix this.  Patches, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/