Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the drm-intel tree

[Sumit Semwal]

On 20 May 2014 12:25, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sumit,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the dma-buf tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c between commit 5cc9ed4b9a7a
> ("drm/i915: Introduce mapping of user pages into video memory (userptr)
> ioctl") from the drm-intel tree and commit 8dfb1f0f8103 ("dma-buf: use
> reservation objects") from the dma-buf tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
Hi Stephen!

This seems good, thanks!

Best regards,
~Sumit.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> index 580aa42443ed,817ec444c976..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> @@@ -229,15 -233,8 +229,16 @@@ static const struct dma_buf_ops i915_dm
>   struct dma_buf *i915_gem_prime_export(struct drm_device *dev,
>                                       struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj, int flags)
>   {
>  +      struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = to_intel_bo(gem_obj);
>  +
>  +      if (obj->ops->dmabuf_export) {
>  +              int ret = obj->ops->dmabuf_export(obj);
>  +              if (ret)
>  +                      return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  +      }
>  +
> -       return dma_buf_export(gem_obj, &i915_dmabuf_ops, gem_obj->size, flags);
> +       return dma_buf_export(gem_obj, &i915_dmabuf_ops, gem_obj->size, flags,
> +                               NULL);
>   }
>
>   static int i915_gem_object_get_pages_dmabuf(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/