Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86,mm: Improve _install_special_mapping and fix x86 vdso naming

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/20/2014 11:01 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>
>> This patch should fix this issue, at least.  If there's still a way to
>> get a native vdso that doesn't say "[vdso]", please let me know/
> 
> Yes, having a native procfs way to detect vdso is much preferred!
> 

Is there any path by which we can end up with [vdso] without a leading
slash in /proc/self/maps?  Otherwise, why is that not "native"?

>>>   The situation get worse when task was dumped on one kernel and
>>> then restored on another kernel where vdso content is different
>>> from one save in image -- is such case as I mentioned we need
>>> that named vdso proxy which redirect calls to vdso of the system
>>> where task is restoring. And when such "restored" task get checkpointed
>>> second time we don't dump new living vdso but save only old vdso
>>> proxy on disk (detecting it is a different story, in short we
>>> inject a unique mark into elf header).
>>
>> Yuck.  But I don't know whether the kernel can help much here.
> 
> Some prctl which would tell kernel to put vdso at specifed address.
> We can live without it for now so not a big deal (yet ;)

mremap() will do this for you.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/