Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for secondary I2C slave address

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 20 May 2014, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:57:26PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:44:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I looked at that but it seems I already acked the regulator part of the
> > > series and nothing else looked immediately relevant?
> 
> > The series has cross dependencies (shared header include) and thus needs
> > to have both the mfd and regulator portions merged together. You had
> > mentioned in the v1 version that you'd like to take it through the
> > regulator tree and so Lee's comments earlier were with regard to you
> > taking the mfd portions.
> 
> Right, OK - because it depends on the earlier MFD patches (I think?) I
> was expecting it to be applied in MFD and merged over to regulator.

Great, that's all I needed to know.  I'm on it.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/