Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 #2

[Olof Johansson]

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't agree with everything above, but it's not worth arguing for the
> sake of arguing. :) I think we can tweak what you're doing now and get
> things to work well by merging new dts files with at91-<soc>-board.dts
> as the name. As mentioned, don't worry about the existing files. This
> shouldn't be a significiant change to what you've been telling people
> since 3.10 to cause much confusion.

A the end of the day, as long as you have at91- as prefix we'll be OK I think.

If you can consistently add the SoC into the prefix as above, we'll be
even better. But I'm not going to spend more time arguing it. :)

Either way, consistency (going forward) with at91- is good.

-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/