Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()

From: Sachin Kamat
Date: Wed May 21 2014 - 23:22:27 EST


On 22 May 2014 01:23, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A call of pr_err() was added in v3.1. It was guarded by a check for
> CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE. The Kconfig symbol PM_VERBOSE was removed in v3.0. So
> this call of pr_err() has never been used. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Untested.
>
> drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> index ab2c1a40d437..0873729135df 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> @@ -175,10 +175,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
> mutex_lock(&set_freq_lock);
>
> if (no_cpufreq_access) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
> - pr_err("%s:%d denied access to %s as it is disabled"
> - "temporarily\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> -#endif

The config symbol itself is not defined and hence could be removed.
However I feel, the
error message could be retained after trimming down the arguments a bit.

--
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/