Re: [PATCH RESEND] mmc: dove: fix missing MACH_DOVE dependency

[Ulf Hansson]

On 23 May 2014 09:16, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 19 May 2014 20:02, Sebastian Hesselbarth
>> <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> DT-enabled Dove moved over from ARCH_DOVE in mach-dove to MACH_DOVE in
>>> mach-mvebu. As non-DT ARCH_DOVE will stay to rot for a while, add a new
>>> DT-only MACH_DOVE Kconfig. This slipped through the cracks and now is
>>> a fix to allow to build Dove's SDHCI driver for mach-mvebu on v3.15-rc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks! Picked up for the PR I send to Chris.
>
> Ulf, you might consider adding your tree to linux-next if this is
> going to be a common work flow for you guys.

That's done already. :-) There are patches which makes this visible in
the MAINTAINERS as well, queued for 3.16.

git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc.git next

Though due to merge conflicts, during this release cycle, I didn't
want to queue any patches besides for the mmci host driver.

>
> It's partially up to Chris though, if he's OK with patches going into
> your branch more or less being guaranteed to make it into his as well.
>

Yes, we need to figure out a good work flow when using two separate
trees. Thanks for bringing this up!

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/