Re: [PATCH v2] mm, compaction: properly signal and act upon lock and need_sched() contention

[Shawn Guo]

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:34:55AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:18:56 +0200
> Subject: mm-compaction-properly-signal-and-act-upon-lock-and-need_sched-contention-fix2
> 
> Step 1: Change function name and comment between v1 and v2 so that the return
>         value signals the opposite thing.
> Step 2: Change the call sites to reflect the opposite return value.
> Step 3: ???
> Step 4: Make a complete fool of yourself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/compaction.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index a525cd4..5175019 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -237,13 +237,13 @@ static inline bool compact_should_abort(struct compact_control *cc)
>  	if (need_resched()) {
>  		if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
>  			cc->contended = true;
> -			return false;
> +			return true;
>  		}
>  
>  		cond_resched();
>  	}
>  
> -	return true;
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
>  /* Returns true if the page is within a block suitable for migration to */
> -- 
> 1.8.4.5
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/