Re: [PATCH] ipath: use time_before()/_after()

[Manuel Schoelling]

On So, 2014-05-25 at 22:17 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Manuel SchÃlling
> <manuel.schoelling@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are
> > modified to use time_before/_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manuel SchÃlling <manuel.schoelling@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c |    4 ++--
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c |    4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c
> > index 26dfbc8..01ba792 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c
> > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void ipath_disarm_senderrbufs(struct ipath_devdata *dd)
> >         if (sbuf[0] || sbuf[1] || (piobcnt > 128 && (sbuf[2] || sbuf[3]))) {
> >                 int i;
> >                 if (ipath_debug & (__IPATH_PKTDBG|__IPATH_DBG) &&
> > -                       dd->ipath_lastcancel > jiffies) {
> > +                       time_after(dd->ipath_lastcancel, jiffies)) {
> 
> Why not time_is_after_jiffies()?
According to Joe Perches [1], time_after() is used much more often than
time_is_after_jiffies() and should be preferred.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg283219.html

> 
> >                         __IPATH_DBG_WHICH(__IPATH_PKTDBG|__IPATH_DBG,
> >                                           "SendbufErrs %lx %lx", sbuf[0],
> >                                           sbuf[1]);
> > @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static int handle_errors(struct ipath_devdata *dd, ipath_err_t errs)
> >
> >         /* likely due to cancel; so suppress message unless verbose */
> >         if ((errs & (INFINIPATH_E_SPKTLEN | INFINIPATH_E_SPIOARMLAUNCH)) &&
> > -               dd->ipath_lastcancel > jiffies) {
> > +               time_after(dd->ipath_lastcancel, jiffies)) {
> >                 /* armlaunch takes precedence; it often causes both. */
> >                 ipath_cdbg(VERBOSE,
> >                         "Suppressed %s error (%llx) after sendbuf cancel\n",
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c
> > index 98ac18e..17a5177 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c
> > @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static void sdma_abort_task(unsigned long opaque)
> >
> >         /* ipath_sdma_abort() is done, waiting for interrupt */
> >         if (status == IPATH_SDMA_ABORT_DISARMED) {
> > -               if (jiffies < dd->ipath_sdma_abort_intr_timeout)
> > +               if (time_before(jiffies, dd->ipath_sdma_abort_intr_timeout))
> >                         goto resched_noprint;
> >                 /* give up, intr got lost somewhere */
> >                 ipath_dbg("give up waiting for SDMADISABLED intr\n");
> > @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ resched:
> >          * JAG - this is bad to just have default be a loop without
> >          * state change
> >          */
> > -       if (jiffies > dd->ipath_sdma_abort_jiffies) {
> > +       if (time_after(jiffies, dd->ipath_sdma_abort_jiffies)) {
> >                 ipath_dbg("looping with status 0x%08lx\n",
> >                           dd->ipath_sdma_status);
> >                 dd->ipath_sdma_abort_jiffies = jiffies + 5 * HZ;
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/