Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] mmc: mmci: Qcomm: Add 3 clock cycle delay after register write

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Mon May 26 2014 - 05:34:44 EST


On 23 May 2014 14:51, <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Most of the Qcomm SD card controller registers must be updated to the MCLK
> domain so subsequent writes to registers will be ignored until 3 clock cycles
> have passed.
>
> This patch adds a 3 clock cycle delay required after writing to controller
> registers on Qualcomm SOCs. Without this delay all the register writes are not
> successful, resulting in not detecting cards. The write clock delay is
> activated by setting up mclk_delayed_writes variable in variant data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> index 881bb24..1385554 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ static unsigned int fmax = 515633;
> * @pwrreg_clkgate: MMCIPOWER register must be used to gate the clock
> * @busy_detect: true if busy detection on dat0 is supported
> * @pwrreg_nopower: bits in MMCIPOWER don't controls ext. power supply
> + * @mclk_delayed_writes: enable delayed writes to ensure, subsequent updates
> + * are not ignored.
> */
> struct variant_data {
> unsigned int clkreg;
> @@ -83,6 +85,7 @@ struct variant_data {
> bool pwrreg_clkgate;
> bool busy_detect;
> bool pwrreg_nopower;
> + bool mclk_delayed_writes;
> };
>
> static struct variant_data variant_arm = {
> @@ -171,6 +174,12 @@ static struct variant_data variant_qcom = {
> .datalength_bits = 24,
> .blksz_datactrl4 = true,
> .pwrreg_powerup = MCI_PWR_UP,
> + /*
> + * On QCom SD card controller, registers must be updated to the
> + * MCLK domain so subsequent writes to this register will be ignored
> + * for 3 clk cycles.
> + */
> + .mclk_delayed_writes = true,
> };
>
> static inline u32 mmci_readl(struct mmci_host *host, u32 off)
> @@ -181,6 +190,9 @@ static inline u32 mmci_readl(struct mmci_host *host, u32 off)
> static inline void mmci_writel(struct mmci_host *host, u32 data, u32 off)
> {
> writel(data, host->base + off);
> +
> + if (host->variant->mclk_delayed_writes)
> + udelay(DIV_ROUND_UP((3 * USEC_PER_SEC), host->mclk));
> }

I am not sure I like this approach. For each and every writel
(including pio_writes) you will add a few cpu cycles, since you need
to check for "mclk_delayed_writes" no matter of variant.

How about, adding a new function pointer in the struct mmci_host, for
"writel operations" which you could set up in probe phase instead?

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/