Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon May 26 2014 - 07:30:46 EST
On Monday, May 26, 2014 04:37:13 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 May 2014 16:52, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I agree as far as the 64-bit thing goes, but is switching to Hz really
> > necessary?
>
> Don't really know that.. It seems that there will always be problems with
> close enough frequencies whenever rounding is done.
Well, rounding errors are a problem, but question is if that is enough of
a problem to justify expanding the storage size twice. Also, that'd be
a performance hit on 32-bit systems.
> More can be elaborated by Soren.
OK
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/