Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] ACPI / LPSS: custom power domain for LPSS
From: Heikki Krogerus
Date: Mon May 26 2014 - 09:42:45 EST
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 04:15:09 PM Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > A power domain where we save the context of the additional
> > LPSS registers. We need to do this or all LPSS devices are
> > left in reset state when resuming from D3 on some Baytrails.
> > The devices with the fractional clock divider also have
> > zeros for N and M values after resuming unless they are
> > reset.
> >
> > Li Aubrey found the root cause for the issue. The idea of
> > using power domain for LPSS came from Mika Westerberg.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Queued up for 3.16, but I needed to rebase it to take some other changes
> into account. Can you please have a look and the bleeding-edge branch in
> my tree and see if everything looks good in there?
I checked the bleeding-edge and it looks good to me. Thanks for taking
care of the issue with "%lx".
About the sparse warning from the clk-fractional-divider.c. Since
there is no real issue, let's follow the style in the other clock
types and ignore the warning. So let's keep that patch as it is. OK?
--
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/