Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Be friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads

[Srivatsa S. Bhat]

On 05/27/2014 04:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Srivatsa,
> 
> On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 02:23:38 AM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> Cpufreq governors like the ondemand governor calculate the load on the CPU
>> periodically by employing deferrable timers. A deferrable timer won't fire
>> if the CPU is completely idle (and there are no other timers to be run), in
>> order to avoid unnecessary wakeups and thus save CPU power.
>>
>> However, the load calculation logic is agnostic to all this, and this can
>> lead to the problem described below.
> 
> This is subtle enough that I need some more time to chew on it, but since the
> merge window is coming, I'm not sure when that's going to happen honestly.
>

Sure, I completely understand. Please take your time, no hurry!

Thank you very much!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/