Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Don't account for cpu idle time with irqsoff tracers
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue May 27 2014 - 20:42:21 EST
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 17:11 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> cpuidle_enter_state() calls ktime_get() which on lockdep enabled builds
> calls seqcount_lockdep_reader_access() which calls local_irq_save() that
seqcount_lockdep_reader_access()?? Ug, I wonder if that should call
raw_local_irq_save/restore() as it's a lockdep helper to begin with. If
it's wrong then it's the lockdep infrastructure that broke, not the core
kernel.
Peter?
-- Steve
> then turns on the tracer again. Perhaps the problem is that irqsoff
> tracer is triggered even when we aren't transitioning between irqs on
> and irqs off? What about this patch? I assume there is a reason that
> this is wrong, but I don't know what it is.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/