Re: [PATCH] bio: decrease bi_iter.bi_size by len in the fail path

From: Ming Lei
Date: Wed May 28 2014 - 11:43:00 EST


Hi Dongsu,

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Dongsu Park
<dongsu.park@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Commit 3979ef4dcf3d1de55a560a3a4016c30a835df44d ("bio-modify-
> __bio_add_page-to-accept-pages-that-dont-start-a-new-segment-v3")
> introduced a regression as reported by Jet Chen.
> That results in a kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166.
>
> To fix that, bi_iter.bi_size must be decreased by len, before
> recounting the number of physical segments.
>
> Tested on with kernel 3.15.0-rc7-next-20140527 on qemu guest,
> by running xfstests/ext4/271.
>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jet Chen <jet.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/bio.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 0443694ccbb4..67d7cba1e5fd 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -810,6 +810,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> bvec->bv_len = 0;
> bvec->bv_offset = 0;
> bio->bi_vcnt--;
> + bio->bi_iter.bi_size -= len;

Would you mind explaining why bi_iter.bi_size need to be
decreased by 'len'? In the failure path, it wasn't added by
'len', was it?


Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/